Since cost-basis data won’t show up on Forms 1099-B until January 2012, this probably seems like something you don’t need to worry about right now. But the data you are transmitting to your brokers beginning this January could impact what is reported on Forms 1099-B next year. In light of this, I have four questions you should ask your brokers now about their plans for compliance with the cost-basis reporting requirements.
1. What is the broker planning to report as the cost-basis for shares acquired pursuant to NQSOs? Brokers are only required to report the purchase price as the cost basis but can voluntarily report the full cost basis. More importantly, are your brokers looking to you to provide the cost basis? If so, perhaps you can avoid some of the mess (and potential for employees to double tax themselves) that Rachel Murillo describes in her Nov. 18 blog entry “Paving the Way for Cost-Basis Reporting Now,” by providing the full cost-basis (price + income recognized), so that the correct basis is reported on Forms 1099-B in 2012. This could be a life-saver for your employees in terms of getting their tax returns correct and for you (and your broker) in terms of the amount of employee education necessary and inquiries that have to be fielded.
2. Ditto for shares issued under restricted stock units and awards. These are considered non-covered securities, so brokers don’t have to report any cost-basis data for them at all, but as with NQSOs, brokers can voluntarily report. Having that data on Form 1099-B could be a big help for employees–if it is correct, of course. If you provide your brokers with the correct cost basis for shares issued under awards, will they report it on Form 1099-B for your employees?
3. Ditto for shares acquired under ISOs and ESPPs. Here, however, things are more complicated because employees often recognize ordinary income at the time of sale, resulting in a stepped up basis that isn’t known until the sale occurs. In some cases, it is literally impossible for you to pass the correct basis to your brokers at the time the shares are acquired. But, in other cases, you might be able to make an educated guess. What makes the most sense to pass as the cost basis? For ESPPs, the FMV at purchase would be the right basis if employees engage in disqualifying dispositions but will be wrong for qualifying dispositions. But, the purchase price is almost always wrong, for both qualifying and disqualifying dispositions (the only time it is the correct basis is for qualifying dispositions where the shares are sold at a loss). For ISOs, FMV at exercise will be the right basis for disqualifying dispositions only if the shares are sold at a price higher than this amount. For qualifying dispositions of ISOs, the exercise price is the correct basis. Where does this leave you in terms of the data you pass to your brokers–now would be a good time to ask, before you start transmitting all this data.
4. How should you transmit this data to your brokers? I understand from the recent Stock & Option Solutions webcast, “Cost Basis Confusion: What Do the New Regulations Mean for Stock Plan Professionals?,” presented by Elizabeth Dodge of SOS and Andrew Schwartz of BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, that issuers may be able to use the DTCC’s Cost Basis Reporting Service (CBRS) to transmit cost-basis data for shares acquired through stock plans. Do your brokers want you to use this service and, if yes, how will you get training on it? If no, what method will you use to transmit this data to them?
Only One Month Left to Get your Free Conference Session Audio All NASPP memberships expire on a calendar-year basis. Renew your membership by Dec 31 and you’ll qualify to receive the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free! Don’t wait any longer–the new year will be here before you know it!
Join Now and Get One Month Free and Free Conference Session Audio! If you aren’t currently an NASPP member, now is the time to become one! Join the NASPP for 2011 and you’ll get the rest of 2010 for free. If that’s not enough, you’ll also get the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free. Tell all your friends!
NASPP “To Do” List We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog.
Renew your NASPP membership for 2011 (if you aren’t an NASPP member, join today). Renew or join by Dec 31 to qualify for the audio of one NASPP Conference session for free.
It’s a big week for NASPP chapter meetings! Don’t miss your local NASPP chapter meetings in Dallas, Houston, NY/NJ, Philadelphia, Silicon Valley, and the Twin Cities. I’ll be at the Silicon Valley chapter meeting; I hope to see you there!
This week I explain the account number box on Forms 3921 and 3922, which will be used to file returns with the IRS for ISO and ESPP transactions. For those of us that are new to filing returns of this sort with the IRS, this box has been causing a fair amount of consternation, as the instructions for its use aren’t completely clear.
Account number isn’t mentioned under the final regulations for Section 6039, so most of us weren’t expecting this box on the forms. It is included because it is a standard box that is part of all of the forms in the 1098 and 1999 series, as well as other similar forms. I, and several practitioners that I spoke to about the forms, had a number of questions regarding what should be reported in this box and whether or not it was required, so I emailed a contact I have at the IRS. Last week, I got a response via phone and email from the IRS tax law specialist that originated the forms.
(Can I mention how unnerving it is to check your voicemail and find that someone from the IRS has left you message? Your first thought is: “Oh no! They’ve found out about the funds in that illegal tax shelter in the Cayman Islands.” Then you remember that you don’t have any funds in any illegal tax shelters anywhere in the world, much less the Cayman Islands. At this point, you aren’t sure whether you should be relieved or disappointed. But, I digress…)
What the Heck is the Account Number?
The Instructions for Forms 3921 and 3922 state: “The account number is required if you have multiple accounts for an employee for whom you are filing more than one Form 3921 [or Form 3922]. Additionally, the IRS encourages you to designate an account number for all Forms 3921 [or Form 3922] that you file. See part L in the most current version of the General Instructions for Certain Information Returns.”
This makes it sound like the account number probably isn’t applicable for our purposes, since employees aren’t likely to have more than one account in their company’s ESPP or stock option plan. This impression is incorrect–the account number is important and, in some circumstances, may be required.
What Purpose Does the Account Number Serve?
The account number serves two purposes, the most important of which is to help the IRS match any corrected forms that are submitted to the original forms that they are intended to correct. The second, less critical, purpose is to help employees match the form to other reports or records they may have of the reported transaction, and, if they are audited, to the IRS’s records. I say that this purpose is less critical because, in these circumstances, I think there are other ways that the forms and records could be matched. But, if multiple forms are submitted for an employee during a calendar year, the system that matches corrected forms to their originals relies solely on the account number.
Say that an employee purchases stock twice in one year in the company ESPP and that the purchases are the triggering event for Section 6039 purposes. The company will file two Forms 3922 for the employee with the IRS. If the company then has to file a corrected Form 3922 for one of the employee’s purchases, the only way the IRS will be able to match the corrected form to the original will be via the account number. Ditto for Form 3921 if an employee has multiple ISO exercises during a year.
The IRS system is not capable of matching the corrected and original forms based any of the other transaction-related fields (grant date, exercise date, etc.). Even if it could, if one of these fields had to be corrected there would be no way to match the two forms without a unique number identifying the transaction.
When Is an Account Number Required?
Where an employee has more than one transaction that must be reported, an account number is required and a unique number should be used for each transaction.
What Number Should be Used as the Account Number?
The account number must be unique to the transaction, not just to the employee. For our purposes, it’s really more of a transaction number than an account number. If you have a system that assigns a unique number to each option exercise or ESPP purchase, you could use that number. If you don’t, you’ll have to devise a system for assigning a unique number to each transaction. You could use employees’ ID or broker account numbers with an additional number or code appended onto the end. For example, if an employee’s ID number is 88888, you could use 8888801 for her first transaction and 8888802 for her second transaction.
The account number should not be longer than 20 digits and can contain letters, numbers and even special characters (dashes, spaces,etc.)
When is an Account Number Optional and Should I Use One Anyway?
Account number is not required if an employee has only one transaction that must be reported during a year. In this case, the IRS system can match the correct form based on the employee’s name or tax ID number and the company’s EIN.
But even in this circumstance, the IRS encourages companies to use an account number. What if the employee’s Tax ID Number is wrong on the original form and there is another employee with the same name? Then, even though every employee has only one form, the account number would still be necessary for the IRS to be able to match the corrected form to the original form. (And, let’s face it, Murphy’s Law demands that the employee whose TIN you get wrong is going to have the same name as another employee.)
Free Conference Session Audio If You Renew by Dec 31 All NASPP memberships expire on a calendar-year basis. Renew your membership by Dec 31 and you’ll qualify to receive the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free!
Join Now and Get Three Months Free and Free Conference Session Audio! If you aren’t currently an NASPP member, now is the time to become one! Join the NASPP for 2011 and you’ll get the rest of 2010 for free. If that’s not enough, you’ll also get the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free. Tell all your friends!
NASPP “To Do” List We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog.
Renew your NASPP membership for 2011 (if you aren’t an NASPP member, join today). Renew or join by Dec 31 to qualify for the audio of one NASPP Conference session for free.
Rachel won’t be blogging on Thursday in light of the Thanksgiving holiday. Hopefully you will all be spending time with your families and friends and wouldn’t have been reading the blog anyway. Happy Thanksgiving!
The upcoming tax season is shaping up to be a confusing one for your plan participants. They will be receiving new bits of information regarding their equity transactions, all intended to be helpful. The problem with information is that it’s only helpful if you can understand it. As your company gears up for your Section 6039 reporting, don’t push cost basis reporting off as an issue that can wait until 2011 year end.
As Barbara pointed out in her June 2nd blog entry, requirements for cost basis reporting come in phases and 2011 marks the first phase. For regular stock sales, this will be very helpful. For equity compensation, however, this first phase actually provides misleading information. The cost basis that is required to be in Box 3 of the new Form 1099-B is only the purchase price of the shares, not the actual cost basis. While it is permissible for brokers to go above and beyond the requirement ahead of schedule, I doubt that it will be feasible for, especially for sales of ESPP shares, to put processes in place to capture and incorporate the necessary information to report the true cost basis for all sales in 2011.
Tower of Babel
What the communication quagmire boils down to is that employees are receiving an increasing number of communications with numbers that represent some piece of their tax puzzle, but not all the numbers will match or even be relevant. The message to your seasoned employees can be simple and clear: There is absolutely no change in the way you need to report your income or capital gains. This is true for both the Section 6039 information statements that employees may receive for this upcoming tax season as well as the changes to 2011 Forms 1099-B. Your new employees or those who still haven’t fully grasped the concepts behind tax reporting, on the other hand, will need to be given the resources to avoid making costly mistakes.
Double Trouble
Just to review, let’s talk about an NQSO exercise. At exercise, the employee realizes income on the difference between the exercise price and the FMV on the exercise date. For example, if 100 shares of an option were exercised for $10 per share when the FMV is $15 per share, the employee would pay an exercise price of $1,000 and realize ordinary income of $500. The new cost basis for these 100 shares is the exercise price plus the income, which is $1500 or $15 per share.
If the exercise in this example takes place in 2011 and the employee sells 11 shares to cover the taxes due, she or he will receive a Form 1099-B from the broker for the 11 shares showing a cost basis of $10 per share. Leaving the fees and commission on the sale out of the conversation, this means that the employee could easily misunderstand and pay capital gains taxes on that same $5 per share that is reported as income on his or her W-2–effectively paying taxes twice.
The Broker Connection
Brokers are making changes to their back-end systems and the user interfaces to accommodate lot ID for sales of shares. Some brokers already have electronic lot selection for some or all brokerage accounts, but the functionality may not yet apply to shares from employer equity plans. You will want to work closely with your broker(s) to understand what any changes will look like for employees, especially if there will be enhanced modeling features. Get educated on how the broker will determine which lot of shares is being sold through employee accounts and if or how employees can designate specific lot sales when selling online.
Now is also a perfect time to provide information to employees on the acceptable methods for determining cost basis of shares and how to plan for tax filing before they engage in a sale. Many brokers have information and FAQs already available that you can leverage to educate your employees.
Because cost basis reporting is only required for sales of shares that were acquired on or after January 1, 2011, you’ll also want to know what your broker is planning to do about reporting for shares purchased prior to 2011.
Break it Down
If possible, provide your employees with an FAQ that illustrates the cost basis of shares sold from each type of equity award that you offer this year so that next year’s conversation won’t mean starting from scratch. If you need a refresher in any of these, the Conference session, “IRS Cost-Basis Reporting: Are Your Stock Plans Ready?” includes a great list. By working to get employees familiar with the term “cost basis” right now, you help them with their tax reporting for this year, making next year’s conversation easier. If you issue ISOs or have an ESPP, any discussion of cost basis must include a refresher on qualifying vs. disqualifying dispositions, which works perfectly into any plans you have in place for educating employees on the Section 6039 information statements they’ll be receiving.
Last week I announced that the IRS had posted the final versions of Forms 3921 and 3922 and discussed a few action items companies can take now to prepare for filing these returns. This week I discuss a few more ways in which companies can get ready.
Make New Friends
As I mentioned last week, your friends in Payroll probably won’t be much help with filing these returns, since the filing system they use for Forms W-2 is completely different. Forms 3921 and 3922 will be filed using the same procedures, and for electronic filing, the same system, that is used to file Forms 1099-MISC. Typically the Accounts Payable group is responsible for filing Forms 1099-MISC, so my guess is that these folks could be very helpful as you try to figure the process out. If you don’t know them, now would be a good time to introduce yourself. Maybe schedule a lunch date so that everyone can get to know one another.
Know the Risks (and Make Sure Your Boss Does Too)
At the recent Silicon Valley NASPP chapter meeting, Alison Wright of Baker & McKenzie pointed out that the penalties for late filings and failures to file were recently increased–news to me.
If the form is filed late by 30 days or less, the penalty is $30 per form, up to a maximum of $250,000 per year.
If the form is late by more than 30 days but is filed by August 1, the penalty is $60 per form, up to $500,000 per year.
If the form is filed after August 1 or not at all, the penalty is $100 per form, up to a maximum of $1.5 million per year!
The penalty for intentional disregard now starts at $250 per form with no maximum.
The penalties for late participant statements (or failures to distribute participant statements) are now aligned with the penalties for late or omitted returns. This means that if you fail to file or are late with both the return and the participant statement, the penalties listed above are doubled.
These penalties are a lot steeper than they used to be; it would be a good idea for everyone involved to be aware of the financial risks to the company.
Submit a Test File
You don’t want to wait until your live filing to figure out if you’ve made a mistake. The FIRE system will accept test filings until February 15, 2011–take advantage of this opportunity.
Be Ready to Request an Extension
The returns are due to the IRS by February 28 (if filing on paper) or March 31 (if filing electronically). You can, however, receive an automatic 30-day extension–no questions asked–by filing Form 8809, which can be filed electronically or on paper. The request for an extension must be filed by the applicable deadline for filing the returns (either Feb 28 or Mar 31) and you still have to distribute the participant statements on time.
As far as I can tell, there are no penalties for requesting the extension. If it gets down to the wire and you aren’t ready to go with the returns, you can always get a 30-day reprieve.
Comparing Solutions for Section 6039 Compliance Don’t miss this Thursday’s webcast on “Comparing Solutions for Section 6039 Compliance,” which will present a side-by-side comparison of the third-party solutions available for Section 6039 compliance. This is a great way to kick off your search for a vendor.
Free Conference Session Audio If You Renew by Dec 31 All NASPP memberships expire on a calendar-year basis. Renew your membership by Dec 31 and you’ll qualify to receive the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free!
Join Now and Get Three Months Free and Free Conference Session Audio! If you aren’t currently an NASPP member, now is the time to become one! Join the NASPP for 2011 and you’ll get the rest of 2010 for free. If that’s not enough, you’ll also get the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free. Tell all your friends!
NASPP “To Do” List We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog.
Renew your NASPP membership for 2011 (if you aren’t an NASPP member, join today). Renew or join by Dec 31 to qualify for the audio of one NASPP Conference session for free.
“Do you know the difference between education and experience? Education is when you read the fine print; experience is what you get when you don’t.” – Pete Seeger
It’s unlikely that if you polled 1,000 high school graduates on their intended career goals that you’d find one who piped up, “I want to be a stock plan manager!” The career paths of active stock plan management team members is quite diverse. Many individuals in stock plan services arrive at their position through a series of employment opportunities that propel them into the world of equity compensation rather than a set of strategic moves toward this field. This means that equity compensation professionals are often learning on the job; learning through experience. While real world experience is essential, there is the danger that individual experience is mistaken for industry knowledge.
These are a few of the top areas where the line between personal experience and actual regulations may blur:
Tax Withholding
It is difficult to maintain 100% compliance when it comes to tax withholding and reporting, particularly internationally. There may also be situations where your company has taken a particularly conservative or liberal interpretation on an issue. When it comes to share withholding for RSUs, for example, some auditing firms and companies are comfortable with rounding tax withholding up to avoid fractional share issues without applying liability accounting.
Insiders and Trading Policies
Section 16 is an area where significant portions of policy could be completely company specific. For example, certain Section 16 officers are identified by their policy-making authority (or lack thereof) rather than their specific title. Or your company may be comfortable permitting the sale of shares to cover taxes on restricted stock vests during a blackout because it is the required withholding method. Knowing the facts behind policy decisions can give you the ability to recognize when circumstances invalidate or change those assumptions.
Plan Parameters
Your company’s stock plan and associated policies include specific definitions that may not be shared by other companies. The definition of FMV or the length of time options are exercisable after termination are two perfect examples. While it is very important to have a clear understanding of your plan parameters, it’s another issue entirely to take for granted that the parameters are compliant or represent common or best practices.
Data Management
The way in which you enter data into your stock plan administration software can be very company specific, especially when it comes to anything that is a work-around. Even if you have inherited detailed procedures, it doesn’t mean that they are still valid in the current environment. When it comes to your software, there is also the risk is that your data entry process is a legacy from and old version of the database or an inadequately thought-out solution.
Change
Why is it important to know where that line is between company-specific experience and actual regulation or best practices? Change happens. Regulations change (e.g., ESPP and the definition of the $25k limit), facts and circumstances change (e.g., an existing position may be modified to include policy-making responsibilities), and your employment may change either through an M&A situation or because of new opportunities. Not only that, but the status quo isn’t infallible. There could be policies or practices in place that are in need of updating.
To help keep you grounded, educate yourself, challenge the status quo and talk to other equity professionals. When it comes to workshops, webinars, white papers and alerts, don’t shy away from topics you think you are completely familiar with. Even if you have been adhering to a particular policy for a long time, it’s never too late to ask questions about it. Don’t just reach out to your peers and colleagues when you have a specific issue, ping them about general practices when you aren’t under the gun. Peruse the NASPP Discussion Forum or your stock plan management software user group forum to see what issues other companies are facing before they become your issues–and always keep in mind that the answers you find may be based on someone else’s experience.
As of yesterday, the final versions of Forms 3921 and 3922, as well as the associated instructions, are available from the IRS. These are the forms that will be used to file the returns required under Section 6039 for ISOs and ESPPs with the IRS. No surprises–the forms are largely unchanged from the draft versions that the NASPP obtained earlier this year. See our alert on the final forms for more information and background.
Getting Ready for Electronic Filing of 6039 Returns – Part I
Based on the last Silicon Valley NASPP Chapter meeting, I think we are starting to get to panic mode on these returns. Alison Wright of Baker & McKenzie and Jessica Carbullido of Con-way, gave a great presentation on the nuts and bolts of filing the returns, particularly on the electronic filing process.
Here are few action items that I came away with. This is only Part I; I’ll have a few more action items for you next week. For general overview of the electronic filing process, read IRS Publication 3609 (look how happy the woman on the cover is, now that she files electronically with the IRS–that could be you!)
Figure Out Your Transmitter Control Code
If you are submitting the returns electronically, you need a TCC. Chances are, your company already has one, but now would be a good time to make sure.
If you are outsourcing the filing to a vendor that is going to submit the returns to the IRS on your behalf, the vendor will likely have their own TCC, so you won’t need to worry about this (but verify this with your vendor).
If you are working with a vendor that is going to create the submission file for you but you will have to submit it (or if you are creating the file yourself), you’ll need your company’s TCC code. If your company submits Forms 1099-MISC electronically (and there’s a pretty good chance that you do), your company already has this code. You just need to find out who has it and what it is. You don’t want to request a new TCC if your company already has one–the IRS frowns on this.
If you need a TCC and you’ve determined that your company doesn’t already have one, you need to apply for one using Form 4419. Might as well get started on this now.
Set Up Your FIRE Account
Electronic filings of Forms 3921 and 3922 will be submitted to the IRS via the FIRE system. (FIRE stands for “Filing Information Returns Electronically”–those IRS folks are so clever!) This is not the same system that is used to file Forms W-2 electronically (those are filed with the Social Security Administration, not the IRS), thus, your friends in payroll and your payroll service providers aren’t going to be much help here. It is, however, the same system that is used to file Forms 1099-MISC electronically. Accounts payable, which is typically the group that files this form, may be your new BFF.
If you are submitting the electronic filing yourself, then you’ll need a FIRE account as well as a TCC. You can (and probably should) set up your own FIRE account even if someone else at your company already has one. To set up your account, go to http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=165534,00.html and follow the instructions under “Create Your Account.” (You’ll have to wait until after 8:00 AM Eastern today to do this–until then, the FIRE system is down for maintenance. It’s been down since last Thursday; that’s a lot of maintenance!)
Find a Vendor
If you were thinking that you could just download some data to Excel and create the submission file yourself, think again. Publication 1220 includes the specifications for the submission file. And, while at 136 pages, this publication is no picnic, the kicker is that the files must be in a fixed-width ASCII format, which requires some advance programming skills to create from Excel. Why the IRS couldn’t use a nice, easy, comma-delimited file–which anyone can create using the Save As function in Excel–is a mystery.
If you haven’t already, you probably want to get started on finding a vendor that can help you create these files (either that, or start making friends with your IT department). The NASPP’s just announced webcast on November 18, “Comparing Solutions for Section 6039 Compliance,” is a great place to begin your vendor search.
Free Conference Session Audio If You Renew by Dec 31 All NASPP memberships expire on a calendar-year basis. Renew your membership by Dec 31 and you’ll qualify to receive the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free!
Join Now and Get Three Months Free and Free Conference Session Audio! If you aren’t currently an NASPP member, now is the time to become one! Join the NASPP for 2011 and you’ll get the rest of 2010 for free. If that’s not enough, you’ll also get the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free. Tell all your friends!
NASPP “To Do” List We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog.
Renew your NASPP membership for 2011 (if you aren’t an NASPP member, join today). Renew or join by Dec 31 to qualify for the audio of one NASPP Conference session for free.
Don’t miss the local NASPP chapter meetings in Boston, the Carolinas, Orange County, San Diego, and Seattle. Robyn Shutak, the NASPP’s Education Director, will be attending the San Diego meeting; be sure to say hello!
The IRS began its Employment Tax National Research Project (NRP) this year (See our January 26th blog entry), auditing 2,000 randomly selected companies. Soon, the next 2,000 will be receiving their notices that they have been selected for 2011. In totally, the IRS will audit 6,000 companies over three years. This NRP comes on the heels of similar studies conducted on Subchapter S Corps in 2003 and 2004 and individual taxpayer returns from 2006 to 2008 returns). All are part of a Department of the Treasury’s commitment to provide updated estimates of the “tax gap” (i.e.; the difference between the taxes owed and the taxes actually collected). A full description of the efforts is included in the Update on Reducing the Federal Tax Gap and Improving Voluntary Compliance.
Don’t think that if you aren’t selected, you’re totally off the hook. These are just the random audits as a part of the evaluation process. Not only are regular tax audits still taking place, the results of the NRPs will be used to help identify which individuals and companies to target for regular audits and what areas of audits are most likely to result in the discovery of noncompliance.
The current NRP will focus on four main issues: fringe benefits, worker classification, executive compensation, and payroll taxes. The stock plan management team won’t have much, if anything, to do with an audit of fringe benefits. Worker classification (i.e.; determining if there are consultants who should be classified as employees) could spill over into stock plan administration. A quick review of your company’s policy on granting to nonemployees and an audit of the database to identify grants to nonemployees will help your company make a full assessment of classifications. Executive compensation sounds like an area that stock plan management would be involved in, but actually the main focus will be on owner-officers and the particular audits in this area may not apply to most corporations. So, the area where the stock plan management team can provide the most assistance is payroll taxes.
Payroll Taxes
At this point, you should already have a regular, at least annual, audit of your tax withholding and remitting policies that helps you identify areas of potential noncompliance. The NRP only increases the risk of your company being audited, but compliance should be a serious focus, regardless. Here are my top areas to review before the new year:
Timing of Tax Deposits
Social Taxes
Mobile Employees
ISOs and 423 ESPPs
162(m) and 409A Compliance
Why Now?
If you uncover areas where the company is not withholding correctly on equity compensation, the beginning of the calendar year is the perfect time to implement new withholding practices. This is especially true for mobile employee withholding and if the change will be prospective only
How Far Should You Go?
When you do identify an area that your company has been out of compliance with, the big question is whether to make policy changes that are prospective or retrospective. Even if you aren’t going to be changing retrospectively, it’s a good idea to at least audit back a minimum of three years, but no specific length of time is appropriate across the board. For example, if you discover that you haven’t been making timely tax deposits, there isn’t a way for you to go back in time and make them any earlier. But, you can go back and audit the instances of noncompliance to help give your company an idea of what fees could result from an audit.
States, Too!
The federal government isn’t the only one with a tax gap to close; states are also looking to find lost tax revenue. What’s more, the IRS has reciprocal agreements with many states to share audit findings. That means that if you are audited by the IRS as part of the NRP or as a regular audit, state and local tax authorities may not be far behind.
As I’m sure my readers know, the Dodd-Frank Act requires public companies to allow shareholders to vote on their executive compensation programs beginning next year. On October 18, the SEC proposed regulations governing how these votes will work, bringing us one step close to the inevitable.
Say-on-Pay Regs Proposed The regulations require three non-binding votes:
Say-on-Pay: Shareholders must be permitted to vote on executive compensation every one, two, or three years. The first vote must be held at the company’s first annual meeting on or after January 21, 2011. Shareholders will be voting on the compensation paid to executives as disclosed in the proxy statement.
Say-When-on-Pay: Shareholders must also be permitted to vote on how frequently the company holds a Say-on-Pay vote. This vote must occur at least every six years, with the first vote at the company’s first annual meeting on or after January 21, 2011.
Say-on-Parachutes: Shareholders must be permitted to vote on golden parachute arrangements. If these arrangements have not previously been voted on, this vote must be included in the proxy statement relating to the merger (or any similar transaction, such as a sale of the company’s assets) for which the compensation will be paid. In connection with this, the SEC is requiring enhanced tabular disclosure of parachute payments in proxy statements for mergers and similar transactions.
Effective Date
The Say-on-Pay and Say-When-on-Pay votes must be included in the proxy for the first annual meeting on or after January 21, 2011, even if the SEC has not finalized these regulations by then. The Say-on-Parachutes vote is not required until the regulations are finalized.
Non-Binding with a Kick
All of the votes are non-binding, which means the company doesn’t have to abide by them. For the Say-on-Pay vote, however, the proposed regulations require companies to discuss in the CD&A how the vote has been considered in setting executive pay. Likewise, for the Say-When-on-Pay vote, companies must disclose in the 10-Q following the vote whether they intend to comply with it. Woe to those companies that don’t choose to comply; shareholders can then introduce a proposal regarding the frequency of Say-on-Pay votes in the next year’s proxy statement.
More Information
We’ve posted an alert on the proposed regs that includes the memos we are receiving from law firms and compensation consultants; look for even more memos to be posted in the next few days. Check out the excellent summaries by Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand and Morrison & Foerster (co-authored by CompensationStandards.com’s David Lynn).
Conference Audio Available Are you ready for Say-on-Pay? Make sure with the many sessions on Say-on-Pay offered at this year’s NASPP Conference. All of the sessions have been recorded and can be downloaded in MP3 format. Purchase just the session(s) you want or save by purchasing a package of sessions.
Free Conference Session Audio If You Renew by Dec 31 All NASPP memberships expire on a calendar-year basis. Renew your membership by Dec 31 and you’ll qualify to receive the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free!
Join Now and Get Three Months Free and Free Conference Session Audio! If you aren’t currently an NASPP member, now is the time to become one! Join the NASPP for 2011 and you’ll get the rest of 2010 for free. If that’s not enough, you’ll also get the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free. Tell all your friends!
NASPP “To Do” List We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog.