The NASPP Blog

Tag Archives: 1934 Act

April 17, 2012

JOBS for Stock Compensation – Part 2

Last week, I highlighted areas of JOBS that impact stock plan administrators.   This week, I take a look at another area of JOBS with relevance to equity compensation–the shareholder threshold that triggers registration under the 1934 Act.

Shareholder Threshold for Required Registration
Private companies with $10 million in assets that have shareholders in excess of a specified amount are required to register with the SEC and then become subject to public reporting requirements. JOBS raises this threshold from 500 to 2,000 shareholders, provided that no more than 499 of the shareholders are nonaccredited investors. (For reasons that I cannot fathom, the nonaccredited investor requirement doesn’t apply to banks–10 points to anyone that knows why this is.  Maybe banks just have better lobbyists.)

Interestingly, some commentators have pointed out (e.g., see the Alston + Bird memo included with the NASPP alert on JOBS) that this enables companies to delay going public, which seems contrary to the purpose of JOBS.

Stock Compensation Exempted

JOBS also exempts shareholders that acquired their stock through company benefit plans from this threshold. SEC regulations and a recently issued no-action letter (see “No Action on RSUs“, February 29, 2012) already exempted options and RSUs from the threshold, but now actual shares of stock acquired through these and other compensatory arrangements are also exempted.

Private companies will now be able to allow their employees to purchase stock before they go public without triggering the registration requirement regardless of how many employees they have. This could be a little dangerous in that employees that don’t have much investing experience sometimes don’t understand the potential pitfalls of investing in high-risk, illiquid stocks. I believe that, in most cases although there are certainly some exceptions, it doesn’t make sense for rank-and-file employees to buy or (incur taxable income on) their employer’s stock before that stock is liquid.

In a series of FAQs issued last week, the SEC clarified that this exemption applies regardless of whether the individual holding stock received through a company stock plan is a current or former employee.  It isn’t clear, however, whether the exemption will continue to apply if the individual sells the stock acquired under a company plan (e.g., on one of the secondary markets) to another investor. 

Deregistering

For non-banks, the threshold for deregistering did not change, so companies that have already been forced to register and are now filing public reports will have to continue to do so until they have fewer than 300 shareholders (or less than $10 million in assets).  For banks, the deregistration threshold did increase, to 1,300 shareholders (again, I have no idea why banks get special treatment). 

NASPP “To Do” List
We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so we keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in our blog. 

– Barbara  

Tags: , , ,

February 28, 2012

No Action on RSUs

It seems like just yesterday I was blogging about the SEC exempting stock options from the 500-holder limit for private companies, but it turns out that I never blogged about that because it happened back in 2007, before we had The NASPP Blog. Time flies and here we are almost five years later and the SEC has provided broad no-action relief from the same limit for RSUs.

What the Heck?

For those of you that aren’t sure what I’m talking about, let’s take a step back. Under U.S. securities laws, private companies that have more than $10 million in assets and more than 500 holders in any company security are required to register with the SEC under the 1934 Act. Most private companies are loath to exceed this threshold because registration causes them to be subject to pretty much all the same public reporting requirements as public companies–Forms 10-Q and 10-K., Form 8-K, Section 16, the whole shebang. It’s all the onerous parts of being a public company but without the upside of raising a bunch of money in an IPO and having publicly traded securities.

Stock options are a type of security, as are RSUs. Now the rule is that the company can’t have more than 500 holders in a single class of securities, so a company could have 499 shareholders and 499 option holders and 499 RSU holders without triggering the registration requirement (so long as none of the optionees exercised their options and none of the RSUs were paid out). But if a company had, say, 501 option holders, the company could be required to register with the SEC. This is a problem for private companies with, say, more than 500 employees that want to grant stock options to all their employees.

So, in 2007, after issuing numerous no-action letters on the matter, the SEC carved out an exception providing that compensatory employee stock options don’t count for purposes of the 500-holder limit, provided the options meet certain requirements. (See the NASPP alert, “SEC Exempts Stock Options from Registration for Private Companies,” December 15, 2007).

Now RSUs, Too

The 2007 exemption, however, didn’t extend to RSUs. So, where a private company wanted to grant RSUs to more than 500 employees, the company had to either register with the SEC or request relief from the registration requirement via a no-action letter–even if the RSUs, by their terms, could not possibly ever be paid out before the IPO.

Earlier this month, however, the SEC granted no-action relief for RSUs to the law firm Fenwick & West. By granting relief to a law firm, rather than a specific company, this no-action letter serves as broad relief for all private companies that wish to offer RSUs to their employees.

The RSUs must meet certain conditions to be eligible for relief–the awards must be granted by a private company, granted to individuals providing service to the company as defined under Rule 701, and transferable under only limited circumstances. In addition, the company must disclose information relating to its financials and risk factors to employees.

But Not Stock Acquired Under RSUs and Options

The relief described above extends only to options and RSUs themselves; it doesn’t cover stock employees acquire under options or RSUs. That stock still counts towards the 500-holder limit.

More Information

See the NASPP’s alert, SEC Issues No-Action Letter on RSUs at Private Companies.

NASPP “To Do” List
We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so we keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in our blog. 

– Barbara

Tags: , , , , , , ,