The NASPP Blog

Tag Archives: cash flow statement

December 8, 2015

Update to ASC 718: The FASB’s Decisions, Part 2

This week I provide additional coverage of the decisions the FASB made on the ASC 718 simplification project (see my blog from last week for Part 1).

Cash Flow Statement

The Board affirmed both of the proposals related to the cash flow statement: cash flows related to excess tax benefits will be reported as an operating activity and cash outflow as a result of share withholding will be reported as a financing activity.  Nothing particularly exciting about either of these decisions but, hey, now you know.

Repurchase Features

The board decided not to go forward with the proposal on repurchases that are contingent on an event within the employee’s control.  The proposal would have allowed equity treatment until the event becomes probable of occurring (which would align with the treatment of repurchases where the event is outside the employee’s control).  The Board decided to reconsider this as part of a future project.  The Board noted that this would have required the company to assess whether or not employees are likely to take whatever action would trigger the repurchase obligation, which might not be so simple to figure out (we all know how hard it is to predict/explain employee behavior).

Practical Expedient for Private Companies

The Board affirmed the decision to provide a simplified approach to determining expected term for private companies, but modified it to allow the approach to be used for performance awards with an explicitly stated performance period.  I’m not sure that many private companies are granting performance-based stock options, but the few who are will be relieved about this, I’m sure.

Options Exercisable for an Extended Period After Termination

Companies that provide an extended period to exercise stock options after retirement, disability, death, etc., will be relieved to know that the FASB affirmed its decision to eliminate the requirement that these options should be subject to other applicable GAAP.  This requirement was indefinitely deferred, but now we don’t have to worry about it at all.

– Barbara

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

June 16, 2015

More on the FASB’s Exposure Draft

Last week, I blogged that the FASB has issued the exposure draft of the proposed amendments to ASC 718.  In this week’s blog entry, I cover some of the additional issues addressed by the amendments.

Cash Flow Statement

The proposed amendments suggest changes to how a couple of items should be categorized in the cash flow statement.  Most significantly, excess tax benefits realized from stock plan transactions would be presented as an operating activity. Currently, excess tax benefits are reported twice in the cash statement: as a cash inflow in the financing activities and a cash outflow in operating activities.  In her “Meet the Speaker interview” last summer, Ellie Kehmeier highlighted the failure to do this as a very common error that companies make, so this change will clearly be helpful.

Private Companies

It is often very difficult for private companies to estimate the expected term of option grants. To assist with this, the proposed amendments would allow private companies to use a method similar to simplified method allowed under SABs 107 and 110. I think a lot of private companies are already doing this, so I’m not sure how revelatory this is. Also, the FASB imposes the same limitations that the SEC does, (i.e., the approach can only be used for options that are exercisable for only a short time after termination of employment), making this somewhat less than helpful.

The FASB is also under the impression that there are a bunch of private companies with liability awards that did not know that they could have elected to value these awards using the intrinsic value method back when they adopted the standard and are now stuck with using the fair value method for them. The proposed amendments would give these companies a one-time opportunity to change the measurement of liability awards from fair value to intrinsic value without having to justify the change.

I don’t encounter a lot of liability awards at either public or private companies, so I am skeptical about how helpful this is, but maybe there are a bunch private companies that just cannot wait to change over to the intrinsic value method for their liability awards. Assuming they are paying attention and don’t miss this opportunity. Considering that they apparently already missed the opportunity once, I’m not optimistic. Are we going to have to go through this all again in another ten years? Maybe the FASB should just give private companies a free pass on changing the valuation method for liability awards once every ten years so we don’t have to discuss this again.

FSP FAS 123(R)-2

In somewhat more exciting news, the amendments would make permanent the guidance in FSP FAS 123(R)-2. This means that we no longer have to worry that, in the future, options that are exercisable for an extended period of time after termination of employment will be subject to liability treatment. I know you probably had forgotten that this was even a possibility, but it’s something I’ve been thinking about as I see FASB alerts that seem to indicate that the FASB is making progress on the other projects that would have impacted this. Now we all have one less thing to worry about. I also think this might be a sign that the FASB may eventually allow awards to non-employees to receive the same treatment as awards to employees—how awesome would that be!

– Barbara

Tags: , , , , , , ,