The NASPP Blog

Tag Archives: Employment Tax National Research Project

June 7, 2011

IRS Auditing Stock Compensation

In late 2009, the IRS announced a major audit initiative for executive compensation that will ultimately involve at least 6,000 companies (see “IRS Audits: Are You Ready to Rumble?” January 26, 2010). We’re now over a year into that project, so I thought it might be a good time to revisit the subject.

No Need to Be Surprised

If you’ve been wondering what the IRS might audit relating to stock compensation, it turns out that there’s no need to be surprised. The IRS explains what they are looking for relating to stock compensation on their website. Here are a few highlights of what you can expect IRS auditors to investigate:

  • In the case of restricted stock and units, whether there has been a transfer of property (e.g., does the employee have voting and/or dividend rights) and whether there is a substantial risk of forfeiture for the award.  According to Stephen Saxon in the March issue of PLANSPONSOR (“Saxon Angle: Audit Trials“), companies that offer accelerated vesting upon retirement should be especially wary of this issue for their retirement-eligible employees.
  • Whether ISOs and ESPPs meet the statutory requirements, especially the $100,000 and $25,000 limitations.
  • Whether income has been properly reported (on Form W-2 or Form 1099-MISC) and taxes withheld (if required) on all types of stock plan transactions.
  • Whether tax withholding for stock compensation has caused companies to exceed the $100,000 next-day deposit threshold that Rachel blogged about a couple of weeks ago (“Timely Tax Deposits,” May 26), and, if so, if companies complied with the deadline.
  • Recordkeeping practices relating to grants, exercises, and other stock plan transactions.
  • Compliance with Section 162(m)–but that’s a topic for another blog. 

Things I Sure Hope Won’t Be a Problem

There are a few items highlighted in the IRS’s audit instructions that I sure hope won’t be a problem for any NASPP members–I know you are all too smart to fall for these traps:

  • Back-dated stock options.  No explanation needed on this one.
  • Transfers of options to a related party.  Under this strategy, an executive would “sell” stock options to a family member or trust in exchange for an unsecured, long-term, balloon payment obligation (essentially, the related party just “promises” to pay the executive for the stock option at some point in the future, a long ways in the future).  The idea was to get around the gift tax that could apply if the option were simply transferred to the family member/trust.  This type of a arrangement has been a no-go with the IRS for some time.
  • Not issuing stock upon same-day-sale exercises of an ISO or ESPP.  Although the tax code itself is not clear, the IRS’s audit instructions specifically state that if, rather than issuing stock on a same-day sale, the underlying shares are simply cancelled in exchange for the spread–in other words, a net exercise–the arrangement is subject to withholding for both income tax and FICA purposes. 
  • Issuing loans to executives for option exercises and then later forgiving or reducing the loans.  Public companies shouldn’t be issuing loans to executives at all, much less forgiving those loans.   

Last Chance to Qualify for Survey Results
This week is your last chance to participate in the NASPP’s 2011 Domestic Stock Plan Administration Survey (co-sponsored by Deloitte).  Issuers must complete the survey by this Friday, June 10, to qualify to receive the full survey results. Register to complete the survey today–we’ve already extended the deadline once, we can’t extend it again!

NASPP Conference Program Now Available
The full program for the 19th Annual NASPP Conference is now available.  Check it out today and register by June 24 for the early-bird discount–this deadline will not be extended.

NASPP “To Do” List
We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog. 

– Barbara 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

November 4, 2010

Employment Tax Audits

The IRS began its Employment Tax National Research Project (NRP) this year (See our January 26th blog entry), auditing 2,000 randomly selected companies. Soon, the next 2,000 will be receiving their notices that they have been selected for 2011. In totally, the IRS will audit 6,000 companies over three years. This NRP comes on the heels of similar studies conducted on Subchapter S Corps in 2003 and 2004 and individual taxpayer returns from 2006 to 2008 returns). All are part of a Department of the Treasury’s commitment to provide updated estimates of the “tax gap” (i.e.; the difference between the taxes owed and the taxes actually collected). A full description of the efforts is included in the Update on Reducing the Federal Tax Gap and Improving Voluntary Compliance.

Don’t think that if you aren’t selected, you’re totally off the hook. These are just the random audits as a part of the evaluation process. Not only are regular tax audits still taking place, the results of the NRPs will be used to help identify which individuals and companies to target for regular audits and what areas of audits are most likely to result in the discovery of noncompliance.

The current NRP will focus on four main issues: fringe benefits, worker classification, executive compensation, and payroll taxes. The stock plan management team won’t have much, if anything, to do with an audit of fringe benefits. Worker classification (i.e.; determining if there are consultants who should be classified as employees) could spill over into stock plan administration. A quick review of your company’s policy on granting to nonemployees and an audit of the database to identify grants to nonemployees will help your company make a full assessment of classifications. Executive compensation sounds like an area that stock plan management would be involved in, but actually the main focus will be on owner-officers and the particular audits in this area may not apply to most corporations. So, the area where the stock plan management team can provide the most assistance is payroll taxes.

Payroll Taxes

At this point, you should already have a regular, at least annual, audit of your tax withholding and remitting policies that helps you identify areas of potential noncompliance. The NRP only increases the risk of your company being audited, but compliance should be a serious focus, regardless. Here are my top areas to review before the new year:

Timing of Tax Deposits
Social Taxes
Mobile Employees
ISOs and 423 ESPPs
162(m) and 409A Compliance

Why Now?

If you uncover areas where the company is not withholding correctly on equity compensation, the beginning of the calendar year is the perfect time to implement new withholding practices. This is especially true for mobile employee withholding and if the change will be prospective only

How Far Should You Go?

When you do identify an area that your company has been out of compliance with, the big question is whether to make policy changes that are prospective or retrospective. Even if you aren’t going to be changing retrospectively, it’s a good idea to at least audit back a minimum of three years, but no specific length of time is appropriate across the board. For example, if you discover that you haven’t been making timely tax deposits, there isn’t a way for you to go back in time and make them any earlier. But, you can go back and audit the instances of noncompliance to help give your company an idea of what fees could result from an audit.

States, Too!

The federal government isn’t the only one with a tax gap to close; states are also looking to find lost tax revenue. What’s more, the IRS has reciprocal agreements with many states to share audit findings. That means that if you are audited by the IRS as part of the NRP or as a regular audit, state and local tax authorities may not be far behind.

-Rachel

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

January 26, 2010

IRS Audits: Are You Ready to Rumble?

Based on a recent IRS announcement and alerts we’ve received from law firms, the IRS is stepping up audit activity on executive compensation and employee benefit plans.

Employment Tax Audits
On November 9, the IRS announced an employment tax research study that will include audits of 6,000 companies over the next three years. The study is expected to help the IRS determine areas of greatest compliance risk, which will aid in selecting and auditing future employment tax returns. Companies file employment tax returns to report taxes that have been withheld on employee wages.

According to an alert issued by Pillsbury, the audits will focus on worker classifications (i.e., employee vs. non-employee), fringe benefits, executive compensation, and qualified employee benefit plans. Levine & Baker also mention the impending audits in their January 2010 client newsletter, warning that companies would be ahead to review their tax practices now, before they get an audit notice and still may have an opportunity to address inadvertent errors.

409A Audits Started Already
According to a Jones Day alert that we posted on Naspp.com, the IRS has already started auditing deferred compensation arrangements for compliance with Section 409A. Recent Information Document Requests issued to companies undergoing audits have included items related to §409A compliance.

As described by Jones Day, the information requested by the IDRs includes:

  • Identification of arrangements that the company does not consider to be subject to §409A, but that create a legally binding right to compensation that won’t be paid until a later year. Stock options and restricted stock, of course, are prime examples of these types of arrangements. They also include plans that are exempted from §409A under the short-term deferral rule.
  • Terms and deadlines for making deferral elections, re-deferrals, and any payment accelerations.
  • The names of “specified employees” and payments made to them upon separation of service.
  • Certain information on stock options and SARs that may be subject to §409A.
  • Any §409A violations and whether the company participated in the §409A corrections program.

Technical Corrections to Section 423 Regs
Turns out the IRS makes typos just like the rest of us. Technical corrections to the final regulations under Section 423 were issued on December 22, 2009. Nothing substantive, though, just a couple of minor textual errors. Just because I thought it would be cool, I’ve annotated the PDF of the final regs that we have posted here on Naspp.com with the corrections; see §1.423-2(a)(1) (pg 15), §1.423-2(d)(3) (pg 24), and §1.423-2(i)(5) Example 5 (pg 39). The full text of the corrections is on pg 46.

ShareComp 2010
The NASPP is happy to announce its support of ShareComp 2010, a fully virtual conference on stock compensation. NASPP members can attend the event for free using the sponsor pass “naspp”; feel free to share this sponsor code with others at your company.

ShareComp 2010 will be held live on February 23, 2010 and all presentations, documents, and booths will be available on-demand for a year afterwards. Presentations, solutions, and providers will focus on the needs of professionals in executive roles, finance, human resources, compensation, accounting and stock administration positions. Benefits of attending include:

  • 16 hours of live global interactive learning and networking
  • Best practices for designing, implementing and managing stock compensation programs
  • Instructional sessions that will share real-world examples, tactics and lessons learned
  • Facilitated discussion forums with experts and practitioners
  • A searchable library, including presentations, Q&A sessions and booth materials
  • A year of access to the conference center and the materials

To find out more about, visit www.sharecomp2010.com. Register today for this no-risk, high-impact event (be sure to enter sponsor pass “naspp” for free registration). While you are attending the event, we hope you’ll stop by the NASPP booth.

NASPP “To Do” List
We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog. 

-Barbara  

Tags: , , , , , , ,