For today’s blog, I feature five trends in tax withholding practices for restricted stock and units, from the 2016 Domestic Stock Plan Design Survey (co-sponsored by the NASPP and Deloitte Consulting):
Share Withholding Dominates; Sell-to-Cover Is a Distant Second. The majority (79% of respondents for executive transactions, 77% for non-executive transactions) report that share withholding is used to fund the tax payments the majority (greater than 75%) of award transactions. Most of the remaining respondents (17% of respondents for executive transactions, 18% for non-executive transactions) report that sell-to-cover is used to pay the taxes due on the majority of award transactions.
Rounding Up Is the Way to Go. Where shares are withheld to cover taxes, 75% of respondents report that the shares withheld are rounded up to the nearest whole share. Most respondents (62% overall) include the excess with employees’ tax payments; only 13% refund the excess to employees.
FMV Is Usually the Close or Average. The overwhelming majority (87%) of respondents use the close or average stock price on the vesting date to determine taxable income. Only 12% look to the prior day’s value to determine taxable income, despite the fact that this approach provides an additional 24 hours to determine, collect, and deposit the tax withholding due as a result of the vesting event (see “Need More Time? Consider Using Prior Day Close“).
Form 1099-B Is Rare for Share Withholding. Although share withholding can be considered the equivalent of a sale of stock to the company, only 21% of respondents issue a Form 1099-B to employees for the shares withheld.
Companies Are Split on Collecting FICA from Retirement Eligible Employees. Where awards provide for accelerated or continued vesting upon retirement, practices with respect to the collection of FICA taxes are largely split between share withholding and collecting the tax from employees’ other compensation (41% of respondents in each case).
In just a couple of weeks, employees will begin receiving Forms 1099-B for sales they conducted in 2015. Here are five things they need to know about Form 1099-B:
What Is Form 1099-B? Anytime someone sells stock through a broker, the broker is required to issue a Form 1099-B reporting the sale. This form is provided to both the seller and the IRS. It reports the net proceeds on the sale, and in some cases, the cost basis of the shares sold. The seller uses this information to report the sale on his/her tax return. [Same-day sale exercises can be an exception. Rev. Proc. 2002-50 allows brokers to skip issuing a Form 1099-B for same-day sales if certain conditions are met. But your employees don’t need to know about this exception unless your broker isn’t issuing a Form 1099-B in reliance on the Rev. Proc.]
The Cost Basis Reported on Form 1099-B May Be Too Low. For shares that employees acquire through your ESPP or by exercising a stock option, the cost basis indicated on the Form 1099-B reporting the sale is likely to be too low.
Sometimes Form 1099-B Won’t Include a Cost Basis. If employees sold stock that was acquired under a restricted stock or unit award, or if they acquired it before January 1, 2011, the Form 1099-B usually won’t include the cost basis (although procedures may vary, so check with your brokers on this).
What To Do If the Cost Basis Is Incorrect (or Missing). If the cost basis is incorrect, employees will need to report an adjustment to their gain (or loss) on Form 8949 when they prepare their tax returns. If the basis is missing, they’ll use Form 8949 to report the correct basis.
An Incorrect Cost Basis Is Likely to Result in Employees Overpaying Their Taxes. It is very important that employees know the correct basis of any shares they sold. They will subtract the cost basis from their net sale proceeds to determine their taxable capital gain (or deductible capital loss) for the sale. Reporting a cost basis that is too low on their tax return could cause them to pay more tax than necessary. In some cases, this doubles their tax liability. The only person who wins in this scenario is Uncle Sam; your employees lose and you lose, because no one appreciates the portion of their compensation that they have to pay over to the IRS. Your stock compensation program is a significant investment for your company; don’t devalue the program by letting employees overpay their taxes.
Employees should review any Forms 1099-B they receive carefully to verify that the cost basis indicated is the correct basis. If it is missing or incorrect, they should use Form 8949 to report the correct basis.
The Portal also has examples and flow charts, all of which have been updated for the 2015 tax forms. [In case you are wondering, there were no significant changes to Form 1099-B, Form 8949, or Schedule D in 2015.]
A riddle: what do the Trade Adjustment Assistance Program, the African Growth and Opportunity Act, and HOPE for Haiti have to do with Forms 3921 and 3922? You might think “not much” but then you aren’t a member of Congress. The Trade Preferences Extension Act, which includes provisions relating to those three things and a couple of other global trade-related items, also increases the penalties for failure to file Forms W-2 and forms in the 1099 series, which includes Forms 3921 and 3922 (why forms 3921 and 3922 are considered part of the “1099” series is another riddle for another day).
The New Penalties
Timing of Correct Filing
New Penalty (Per Failure)
New Annual Cap
Old Penalty (Per Failure)
Old Annual Cap
Within 30 days
$50
$500,000
$30
$250,000
By Aug 1
$100
$1,500,000
$60
$500,000
After Aug 1 or never
$250
$3,000,000
$100
$1,500,000
With intentional disregard,
regardless of timing
Min. of $500
uncapped
Min. of $250
uncapped
Make That a Double
The penalties apply separately for returns filed with the IRS and the statements furnished to employees. If a company fails to do both, both the per-failure penalty and the cap is doubled. Thus, if both the return and the employee statement are corrected/filed/furnished after Aug 1, that’s a total penalty of $500, up to a maximum of $6,000,000. If intentional disregard is involved, that’s a minimum total penalty of $1,000 (and this amount could be higher) with no annual maximum.
Effective Date
The new penalties will be effective for returns and statements required after December 31, 2015, so these penalties will be in effect for 2015 forms that are filed/furnished early next year.
Penalties At Least As Interesting As the Trade Provisions?
Interestingly, when I Googled “Trade Preferences Extension Act,” so I could figure out what the rest of the act was about, the first page of search results included as many articles about the new penalties as about the trade-related provisions of the act.
If you want to know what the rest of the act is about, here is a summary from the White House Blog. There’s not a lot more to say about the penalties but if you want to spend some time reading about them anyway, here are summaries from Groom Law Group and PwC.
As we head into the year-end season, I know many of you are going to be looking at your year-end communications to see which parts need to be updated. I thought it might be a good time to remind you that the regulations governing cost-basis reporting for shares acquired under stock options and ESPPs are changing as of January 1.
What’s Changing?
Beginning January 1, 2014, brokers will no longer be allowed to include the compensatory income recognized in connection with shares acquired under an option or ESPP in the cost basis reported on Form 1099-B. Instead, brokers are required to report only the purchase price as the basis and employees will have to report an adjustment on Form 8949 to correct the gain or loss they report on their tax return (see my blog entry, “Final Final Cost-Basis Reporting Regs,” May 7, 2013)
Until next January, brokers can voluntarily choose to include this income in the basis, but are not required to do so. Thus, we are going from a situation in which the cost basis reported on Form 1099-B is actually sometimes correct to a situation in which it will virtually always be wrong. Ten points if you can name a scenario in which the purchase price is actually the correct basis for shares that were acquired under a stock option or ESPP.
[Note that, technically, the regs will only apply to options acquired after January 1, 2014, but we think most brokers will apply them to all shares acquired after the date, even if the shares were acquired under an option granted prior to that date.]
How Does This Impact Forms 1099-B for Sales in 2013?
That is a good question! Right now, we are in a transition period. Brokers can continue to report under the old rules for 2013 or they can voluntarily change over to the new rules. A good first step to reviewing your year-end employee communications will be to check in with your brokers on this, so you know what they are planning to do and can adjust your communications appropriately, if necessary.
Does this Impact Restricted Stock and Units?
In most cases, it will not have any impact on restricted stock or RSUs. Arrangements in which employees don’t pay cash for the shares aren’t covered by the regulations so brokers don’t have to report any basis for them at all on Form 1099-B. That still applies under the regulations going into effect as of January 1, 2014. So I expect that most brokers aren’t reporting a basis for RS/RSUs now and still won’t report a basis once the new regs go into effect.
The only exception will be those brokers that are currently reporting a cost basis on a voluntary basis for RS/RSUs (which I understand to be few and far between). Brokers can still voluntarily report a basis for shares acquired under RS/RSUs, but for shares acquired after January 1, 2014, that basis cannot include any of the compensatory income recognized in connection for the award. In other words, the broker can still report a basis but the reported basis has to be $0. I hope that brokers don’t do that–I think it would be better to not report a basis at all than to report an incorrect basis of $0.
Can the NASPP Help?
Why, yes, we can! Our Cost-Basis Reporting Portal includes some great sample materials to help you explain all of this to your employees. We have sample tax forms, flow charts, and extensive FAQs. Check it out today and keep an eye on the portal; we will update it as new tax forms become available from the IRS.
I feel like I’ve been blogging about proposed and final cost-basis reporting regs for Form 1099-B for three years now. Wait, I have been blogging about this topic for that long–my first entry was on June 2, 2010 (“Cost-Basis Reporting: Complicating an Already Confusing Topic“). Over that period, we’ve seen several iterations of regulations–this was, after all, a three-phase project for the IRS. But we’re now at the end of phase three and the final set of final regulations have been issued.
Not the News You Were Hoping For
As my readers know (because you’re all so smart and also I’ve blogged on this to the point where you probably wish I’d just shut up about it), the cost basis of shares acquired under stock compensation arrangements includes two components: 1) the amount paid for the stock and 2) any compensation income recognized in connection with the arrangement.
Under the first set of regs that were released in 2010, brokers were temporarily relieved (until 2013) of the obligation to include #2 (the compensation income component) in the cost-basis reported on Form 1099-B. Brokers could, however, voluntary report the correct basis if they were able to (and, to my knowledge, several brokers did this). Then, in 2012, the IRS issued proposed regs that indefinitely extended this relief beyond 2013. In the final regs, not only is this relief made permanent but brokers are prohibited from even voluntarily including the compensation income in the basis.
Thus, for sales of any shares acquired under stock compensation arrangements after January 1, 2014, brokers are required to report only the amount paid for the stock as the cost basis on Form 1099-B. This basis will almost always be wrong (twenty points if you know the two circumstances for which it is the correct basis). Employees will then have to adjust the gain on Form 8949 when they file their tax return to avoid overpaying tax on their sales.
By prohibiting brokers from voluntarily reporting the correct basis, the IRS was hoping to achieve consistency on Form 1099-B. And, having written all the various iterations of flow charts for reporting sales that we have available in our Cost-Basis Reporting Portal, I have to say that I think consistency will be helpful. But I kinda wish the IRS had gone for consistency in the other direction–i.e., requiring brokers to report the correct basis, rather than an incorrect basis.
A Silver Lining
One bit of good news in the regs is that, beginning in 2014, brokers will be required to report sale proceeds net of fees on Form 1099-B. This small change will eliminate about two-thirds of the flow charts in the Cost-Basis Reporting Portal so I expect it also make your educational materials a little simpler as well.
Back in November, the IRS proposed additional regulations on cost-basis reporting. These regulations primarily relate to the third phase of implementation of the reporting requirements, which applies to options and debt securities. But there are a few areas in the regulations that are of interest to stock plan professionals.
You Win Some: Sale Proceeds to Be Reported Net of Fees
It will come as a relief to anyone that has reviewed any of my cost-basis reporting flow charts to know that the regulations would require all brokers to deduct the transaction fees from the sale proceeds reported on Form 1099-B. In my humble opinion, this is a requirement that is long overdue. The fees are usually a small amount, sometimes immaterial, but trying to explain how they are included in the tax return when the broker doesn’t deduct them from the sale proceeds (or worse, when you don’t know whether the broker has deducted them) is almost an insurmountable challenge. If the IRS adopts these regulations and requires all brokers to report the sale price net of fees, I’ll be able to reduce my 6039 flow charts from 14 pages down to a mere five pages.
You Lose Some (or The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same)
Readers of prior NASPP blog entries (see “Four Questions to Ask Your Brokers,” Nov. 30, 2010) know that the current regulations, which have been in effect since January 1, 2011, allow brokers to exclude the compensation component from the reported cost basis until 2013 for shares acquired under stock compensation arrangements. The newly proposed regs not only retain this exclusion but remove the limitation that it is only available until 2013. Thus, it doesn’t look like brokers will be required to report the full basis of shares acquired under stock compensation arrangements for the foreseeable future. I guess the silver lining here is that now you will get more than two years of use out of all those great educational materials you’ve been creating to explain this to your employees.
The regulations state that the IRS is contemplating requiring brokers to indicate whether the shares sold were acquired under a compensatory arrangement on the Form 1099-B (and in transfer statements). Frankly, I’m not really sure this helps much. For most employees, even executives, the only stock of their employer that they own was acquired through compensatory arrangements. When they sell their employer’s stock, I think they probably already know that the stock was acquired through a compensatory arrangement.
The proposed regs also state that the IRS will update the instructions to Schedule D and Form 8949 to clarify that the basis for shares acquired under compensatory arrangements may be incorrect. I have to admit that I’m not confident this is going to help much, especially given how clear the instructions included with Forms 3921 and 3922 are.
I will be hauling my cost-basis reporting soapbox to the February Silicon Valley and Sacramento chapter meetings, where Larry Reynolds of E*TRADE and I will provide a just-in-time overview of cost basis and the new Forms 1099-B. I hope to see you there!
Get in the Game If you haven’t been playing the NASPP Question of the Week Challenge, now is a great time to join the game. A new challenge just started and you have until Feb 3 to answer all the questions posted in January (after that, you only have a week to answer each question). All the cool kids are doing it–sign up today.
NASPP “To Do” List We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog.
As our faithful readers know (because we’ve certainly harped on this topic enough), 2011 Forms 1099-B (which brokers will be sending out shortly) are subject to the new cost-basis reporting requirements. We’ve posted some resources to help you understand the new requirements and help you get a start on materials explaining them to your stock plan participants. In today’s blog entry, I highlight the new (and a few old) materials now available on Naspp.com.
Reporting Examples
We’ve created the following reporting reporting examples. Each example includes an annotated Form 1099-B, Form 8949, and Schedule D so you can see how sales of shares acquired under the various scenarios will appear on each of these forms:
We’ve also posted a sample FAQ on the new cost-basis reporting requirements and the new Form 8949. It even includes an annotated Form 8949. Use this as a starting point for your own FAQ for your stock plan participants.
We’ve also posted a sample email that might be sent to employees to alert them to the dangers of not verifying that the cost basis reported on their Form 1099-B is correct.
Flow Charts
Last year, we created the renowned Section 6039 flow charts (one member told us these charts alone made membership worth the cost), which explain how employees can use Forms 3921 and 3922 to report sales of shares acquired under ISOs and ESPPs on their tax returns. Those flow charts have now been updated for the new Form 1099-B and Form 8949. In addition, we’ve created flow charts for NQSOs and RS/RSUs.
For your employees, myStockOptions.com is a great resource, offering illustrated and annotated tax forms, FAQs, and numerous articles on how employees should report sales of stock on their tax return.
NASPP “To Do” List We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog.
With the new Forms 1099-B that will be issued for the first time next year, the process for reporting sales of stock on Schedule D has changed significantly. In today’s blog, I take a look at the new procedures.
But First, New Form 8949
The biggest change to the process is that taxpayers now have to report every sale of stock on Form 8949, which was introduced for the first time this year. The instructions to the form will be included in the instructions to Schedule D, which were not available as of one minute ago, when I started writing this blog entry. Luckily, however, Andrew Schwartz of BNY Mellon Shareowners Services managed to snag a draft of the instructions from the IRS and generously provided it to me. I also had the benefit of listening to Andrew explain how Form 8949 is used when we presented on cost-basis reporting at the NASPP Conference (you can enjoy this benefit as well by purchasing the audio from our session).
Form 8949 will include information that used to be reported on Schedule D, including the description of the property that was sold (column a), the date acquired (column c), and the date sold (column d). It will also include information that will still be reported on Schedule D, including the sales price (column e on both forms), cost basis (column f), and any adjustments to the gain or loss (column g). Finally, it includes a code that explains the reason for the adjustment to the gain or loss (column b).
When reporting sales of stock, employees will report the cost basis as reported on Form 1099-B in column f. If this basis isn’t correct (see the Nov 18, 2010 blog entry “Pave the Way for Cost Basis Reporting Now“), then employees will report code B in column b and will report an adjustment in column g. If there is no basis reported on the Form 1099-B, then employees will report the correct basis in column f, but won’t report anything in column b (code) or column g (adjustments).
Multiple Forms 8949
Employees will fill out separate Forms 8949 for the following transactions:
Sales for which a basis is reported on Form 1099-B
Sales for which a basis is NOT reported on Form 1099-B
Sales for which a 1099-B is not issued (e.g., if your broker relies on Rev. Proc. 2002-50 to not issue a Form 1099-B for same-day sales).
Form 8949 has two parts, one for short-term capital gains and one for long-term gains, so employees could have to include up to six of these forms with their tax return.
What About Schedule D?
Rather than reporting each individual sale on Schedule D, this form is now just an aggregate of the individual transactions reported on Form 8949. This is where employees will subtract their cost basis and any adjustments from their sale price to determine their actual gain, which is reported in column h.
Things Could Change
Note that today’s blog entry is based on a draft of the instructions. I don’t expect any significant changes in the final instructions, but you just never know with the IRS.
NASPP “To Do” List We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog.
Since cost-basis data won’t show up on Forms 1099-B until January 2012, this probably seems like something you don’t need to worry about right now. But the data you are transmitting to your brokers beginning this January could impact what is reported on Forms 1099-B next year. In light of this, I have four questions you should ask your brokers now about their plans for compliance with the cost-basis reporting requirements.
1. What is the broker planning to report as the cost-basis for shares acquired pursuant to NQSOs? Brokers are only required to report the purchase price as the cost basis but can voluntarily report the full cost basis. More importantly, are your brokers looking to you to provide the cost basis? If so, perhaps you can avoid some of the mess (and potential for employees to double tax themselves) that Rachel Murillo describes in her Nov. 18 blog entry “Paving the Way for Cost-Basis Reporting Now,” by providing the full cost-basis (price + income recognized), so that the correct basis is reported on Forms 1099-B in 2012. This could be a life-saver for your employees in terms of getting their tax returns correct and for you (and your broker) in terms of the amount of employee education necessary and inquiries that have to be fielded.
2. Ditto for shares issued under restricted stock units and awards. These are considered non-covered securities, so brokers don’t have to report any cost-basis data for them at all, but as with NQSOs, brokers can voluntarily report. Having that data on Form 1099-B could be a big help for employees–if it is correct, of course. If you provide your brokers with the correct cost basis for shares issued under awards, will they report it on Form 1099-B for your employees?
3. Ditto for shares acquired under ISOs and ESPPs. Here, however, things are more complicated because employees often recognize ordinary income at the time of sale, resulting in a stepped up basis that isn’t known until the sale occurs. In some cases, it is literally impossible for you to pass the correct basis to your brokers at the time the shares are acquired. But, in other cases, you might be able to make an educated guess. What makes the most sense to pass as the cost basis? For ESPPs, the FMV at purchase would be the right basis if employees engage in disqualifying dispositions but will be wrong for qualifying dispositions. But, the purchase price is almost always wrong, for both qualifying and disqualifying dispositions (the only time it is the correct basis is for qualifying dispositions where the shares are sold at a loss). For ISOs, FMV at exercise will be the right basis for disqualifying dispositions only if the shares are sold at a price higher than this amount. For qualifying dispositions of ISOs, the exercise price is the correct basis. Where does this leave you in terms of the data you pass to your brokers–now would be a good time to ask, before you start transmitting all this data.
4. How should you transmit this data to your brokers? I understand from the recent Stock & Option Solutions webcast, “Cost Basis Confusion: What Do the New Regulations Mean for Stock Plan Professionals?,” presented by Elizabeth Dodge of SOS and Andrew Schwartz of BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, that issuers may be able to use the DTCC’s Cost Basis Reporting Service (CBRS) to transmit cost-basis data for shares acquired through stock plans. Do your brokers want you to use this service and, if yes, how will you get training on it? If no, what method will you use to transmit this data to them?
Only One Month Left to Get your Free Conference Session Audio All NASPP memberships expire on a calendar-year basis. Renew your membership by Dec 31 and you’ll qualify to receive the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free! Don’t wait any longer–the new year will be here before you know it!
Join Now and Get One Month Free and Free Conference Session Audio! If you aren’t currently an NASPP member, now is the time to become one! Join the NASPP for 2011 and you’ll get the rest of 2010 for free. If that’s not enough, you’ll also get the audio for one NASPP Conference session for free. Tell all your friends!
NASPP “To Do” List We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog.
Renew your NASPP membership for 2011 (if you aren’t an NASPP member, join today). Renew or join by Dec 31 to qualify for the audio of one NASPP Conference session for free.
It’s a big week for NASPP chapter meetings! Don’t miss your local NASPP chapter meetings in Dallas, Houston, NY/NJ, Philadelphia, Silicon Valley, and the Twin Cities. I’ll be at the Silicon Valley chapter meeting; I hope to see you there!
Cost-Basis Reporting: Helpful Information or Disaster Waiting to Happen? Cost-basis reporting on Form 1099-B will be required for sales of any equity securities acquired after January 1, 2011. This includes sales of shares acquired under stock option, restricted stock/unit, and other stock plans, as well as shares acquired under ESPPs. But the rules apply slightly differently to shares acquired under these plans than for, say, shares acquired via a run-of-the-mill open-market purchase. The end result is likely to be a lot of confusion, a lot of employee inquiries, and, probably, a lot of overpayment of taxes.
Understanding Cost-Basis for Equity Compensation
For shares acquired through an open-market purchase, the cost basis is simply the amount paid for the shares plus any transaction fees (including fees for the sale transaction, if the broker doesn’t report the sale proceeds net of fees on Form 1099-B). But for shares acquired under a stock compensation program, the cost basis also includes any income reported on the employee’s Form W-2 in connection with either the purchase or the sale of the shares.
Maybe You Should Install a Second Phone Line
The proposed regulations on cost-basis reporting, however, only require brokers, et. al., to report the amount paid for the securities as the cost basis on Form 1099-B. Regulations requiring brokers to report the full cost basis won’t be effective until 2013 at the earliest. For stock compensation, this seems like a huge flaw in the reporting requirements.
If, as a stock plan administrator, you’ve been thinking that you don’t need to worry about these rules because it isn’t your job to issue Forms 1099-B, think again! I can only imagine how confusing this will be for employees–who are already pretty confused about how to report stock compensation on Schedule D. Unless you have some top-notch communications about this, you’ll need to be prepared for a lot of employee confusion and inquiries. And this goes for brokers too–employees are just as likely to look to the broker that issued the Form 1099-B for answers as they are to look to their company’s stock plan administrator.
Now I Understand the Additional Tax Revenue
I suspect that many employees will simply report the Form 1099-B cost basis on their Schedule D, not realizing that this is an understated amount. This will cause employees to pay capital gains tax on the amounts that have already been taxed at ordinary income rates. If the sale is less than a year after the stock was acquired (as in the case of a same-day sale exercise), it is a short-term gain, taxed at the same rate as ordinary income. This doubles the federal income tax paid on the transaction–for employees in the highest tax bracket, it could result in taxes paid of more than 80% of the spread.
I’ve been trying to figure out how cost-basis reporting is going to generate so much additional tax revenue, but now I think I understand.
And, if by some miracle, employees do manage to report the correct tax basis on their tax returns, what happens when the cost basis reported on Schedule D doesn’t match the basis reported on Form 1099-B? Currently, if there is a discrepancy in the sale proceeds reported on Schedule D vs. Form 1099-B, this triggers an automatic IRS notice that there is an error on the return. Will the same type of notice be generated if the reported cost-basis amounts don’t match? If so, how will employees explain the discrepancy to IRS auditors–who probably don’t understand cost-basis for equity compensation any better than they do?
Do You Know What Your Brokers Are Doing?
As I understand it, brokers are permitted to go above and beyond the minimum reporting requirements. If they have the full cost-basis information available and are so inclined, brokers can report the full cost basis (amount paid plus amounts included income) on Form 1099-B. Now would be a good time to ask your brokers a few questions about how they plan to comply:
What will they report as the cost basis for shares acquired under various types of stock compensation arrangements? Ask specifically about NQSOs, restricted stock/units, ISOs, and ESPPs if you offer all of these arrangements.
What sort of communication materials are your brokers going to provide to employees to help them understand the information reported on Form 1099-B and how will this information be provided? Will they actively distribute information to employees or will employees have to ask for it?
Thanks to Andrew Schwartz at BNY Mellon Shareowner Services for providing the background information on how the cost-basis reporting requirements apply to stock compensation. Be sure to check out Andrew’s interview on cost-basis reporting in the upcoming issue of The NASPP Advisor.
18th Annual NASPP Conference Don’t miss the 18th Annual NASPP Conference from Sept 20-23 in Chicago. We just posted this year’s program and it is phenomenal–we’ve planned over 40 sessions on critical and timely topics, like cost-basis reporting. Register for the Conference today.
NASPP “To Do” List We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog.