A riddle: what do the Trade Adjustment Assistance Program, the African Growth and Opportunity Act, and HOPE for Haiti have to do with Forms 3921 and 3922? You might think “not much” but then you aren’t a member of Congress. The Trade Preferences Extension Act, which includes provisions relating to those three things and a couple of other global trade-related items, also increases the penalties for failure to file Forms W-2 and forms in the 1099 series, which includes Forms 3921 and 3922 (why forms 3921 and 3922 are considered part of the “1099” series is another riddle for another day).
The New Penalties
Timing of Correct Filing
New Penalty (Per Failure)
New Annual Cap
Old Penalty (Per Failure)
Old Annual Cap
Within 30 days
$50
$500,000
$30
$250,000
By Aug 1
$100
$1,500,000
$60
$500,000
After Aug 1 or never
$250
$3,000,000
$100
$1,500,000
With intentional disregard,
regardless of timing
Min. of $500
uncapped
Min. of $250
uncapped
Make That a Double
The penalties apply separately for returns filed with the IRS and the statements furnished to employees. If a company fails to do both, both the per-failure penalty and the cap is doubled. Thus, if both the return and the employee statement are corrected/filed/furnished after Aug 1, that’s a total penalty of $500, up to a maximum of $6,000,000. If intentional disregard is involved, that’s a minimum total penalty of $1,000 (and this amount could be higher) with no annual maximum.
Effective Date
The new penalties will be effective for returns and statements required after December 31, 2015, so these penalties will be in effect for 2015 forms that are filed/furnished early next year.
Penalties At Least As Interesting As the Trade Provisions?
Interestingly, when I Googled “Trade Preferences Extension Act,” so I could figure out what the rest of the act was about, the first page of search results included as many articles about the new penalties as about the trade-related provisions of the act.
If you want to know what the rest of the act is about, here is a summary from the White House Blog. There’s not a lot more to say about the penalties but if you want to spend some time reading about them anyway, here are summaries from Groom Law Group and PwC.
When the NASPP conducted our quick survey on Section 6039 back in October, there were a lot of “undecided” responses. So we conducted another survey last month. The results are in and decisions have been made.
Filing Section 6039 Returns with the IRS
Electronic filing is the clear winner here, with 78% of respondents filing the returns for ISOs electronically and a landslide 90% filing electronically for their ESPP transactions. Surprisingly, 5% of respondents are planning to file ESPP returns on paper; they must be from very small companies or have very low participation rates in their ESPP to manage this. I can’t imagine trying to file the returns on paper–my handwriting would never pass muster with the IRS and I have no idea where to scare up a typewriter these days.
In terms of getting the job done, the trend is towards outsourcing. Only 23% of respondents are preparing and filing in-house for ESPP returns; more–41%–are handling the job in-house for ISOs. When we asked this question back in October, 29% were undecided, but now that the deadline looms near, almost everyone has made a decision: only 2% remain undecided about outsourcing for ISO returns and only 5% are undecided for ESPP returns.
Participant Statements
More companies than I expected were planning on distributing copies of the actual Forms 3921 and 3922 to their employees: 32% of respondents for ISOs and 26% of respondents for ESPPs. Of course, as I’m sure all of these folks know, the IRS did not make the forms available in time for this, so these folks most likely ended up distributing substitute statements (unless they requested an extension from the IRS).
Most of the rest of the respondents distributed substitute statements that aggregated multiple transactions on one page: 58% of respondents for ISOs and 64% of respondents for ESPPs.
Back in October, 50% of respondents were on the fence about including an explanatory letter with the statements. I’m pleased to see that the majority decided to go with the more-information-rather-than-less approach: 86% of respondents ended up including an explanatory letter with ISO statements and 88% did so for ESPP statements.
Decisions went the opposite way on distributing the statements electronically. 24% of respondents were considering this back in October, but the majority (90% for ISO statements, and 87% for ESPPs) ended up distributing the statements on paper. Not surprising, given the onerous requirements for electronic distribution. It will be interesting to see how many companies move towards electronic distribution in the next few years.
More Information
For everything you need to know about Section 6039, check out the NASPP’s Section 6039 Portal.
A More Social NASPP The NASPP is networking socially: you can now follow us on Twitter or like us on Facebook. We’ll be posting announcements whenever we post new content on Naspp.com–it’s a great way to keep up with all the content we have on the website.
NASPP “To Do” List We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in my blog.
As the deadline for Section 6039 returns and information statements gets closer, the activity on the NASPP Discussion Forum regarding them increases. This week, I’d like to highlight some of the issues that have been coming up for stock plan administrators and give a couple reminders.
If you don’t already peruse the Discussion Forum, submit your questions, or share your experience there, you really should check it out. It is a great place to bounce ideas off other stock plan professionals before you confirm with your own advisors.
Paper Forms
If you planning on ordering Forms 3921 and/or Forms 3922 for paper filing with the IRS, they aren’t yet available. (Thanks to Bruce Brumberg of myStockOptions.com for bringing this to my attention!) It’s my understanding that you should be able to place an order by the end of January, giving you plenty of time to complete them even with the 7-10 day processing period. Alternatively, you may choose to do an electronic filing even if your company is eligible for paper filing.
If you are planning on ordering the forms to use for employee information returns and are concerned about the timing, consider using a substitute form. We have examples available on the Section 6039 portal. To order official IRS forms or to check on the status of availability, call 1-800-TAX-FORM (1-800-829-3676).
Same-Day Sales
Unlike W-2 reporting, a disqualifying disposition of ISO shares does not impact your Section 6039 reporting. Even if the exercise is a same-day sale, you are required to report the exercise on Form 3921. (See Topic 6689.)
Multiple Transactions
If you have multiple transactions for an employee to report, you may choose to create a substitute form that consolidates all ISO exercises into one substitute Form 3921 and all ESPP transfers into one substitute Form 3922. However, you may not report multiple transactions on a paper filing of either form with the IRS. Electronic filing, of course, is not impacted by the format you choose for the employee statements. Also, if you have more than one transaction for an employee, you will need to include a unique account number for each transaction on the filing to the IRS and most likely also need to include it on any substitute form that you use for employee communications. (See Topics 6782, 6778, and 6710.)
Foreign Nationals
You will most likely need help to identify any foreign nationals for whom a Form 3921 or 3922 is required because of the complexity surrounding resident status. You do not need to file for foreign nationals who are considered nonresident aliens and who have not received a Form W-2 from the company between the grant and the ISO exercise or ESPP transfer. However, you should file a return and send an employee statement to all U.S. citizens with applicable transactions regardless of their current location. (See Topics 6790, and 6713.)
Unusual Situations
For ISOs that are treated as an NQ at the time of the exercise (e.g. more than three months after termination), you should not have a Section 6039 reporting obligation for the exercise. (See Topic 6787.)
If you have an ISO that was exercised in 2010 by the beneficiary or estate of a deceased employee, it would be safe to file Form 3921 and provide an information statement to the beneficiary or estate for the exercise. There is nothing in the Section 6039 regulations to indicate that there is an exemption for these types of transactions, a you would absolutely want to check with your advisors if you are leaning towards not filing in this situation. (See Topic 6773.)
Reminder #1: The returns are due to the IRS by February 28 (if filing on paper) or March 31 (if filing electronically). You can, however, receive an automatic 30-day extension by filing Form 8809, which can be filed electronically or on paper by the applicable deadline for filing returns.
Reminder #2: If you are filing electronically and haven’t already sent a test file, the FIRE system is accepting test filings through February 15th. IRS Publication 3609 details the electronic filing process. If you still need a TCC Number, you must apply for one 30 days prior to the filing deadline.