The NASPP Blog

Tag Archives: JOBS Act

April 17, 2012

JOBS for Stock Compensation – Part 2

Last week, I highlighted areas of JOBS that impact stock plan administrators.   This week, I take a look at another area of JOBS with relevance to equity compensation–the shareholder threshold that triggers registration under the 1934 Act.

Shareholder Threshold for Required Registration
Private companies with $10 million in assets that have shareholders in excess of a specified amount are required to register with the SEC and then become subject to public reporting requirements. JOBS raises this threshold from 500 to 2,000 shareholders, provided that no more than 499 of the shareholders are nonaccredited investors. (For reasons that I cannot fathom, the nonaccredited investor requirement doesn’t apply to banks–10 points to anyone that knows why this is.  Maybe banks just have better lobbyists.)

Interestingly, some commentators have pointed out (e.g., see the Alston + Bird memo included with the NASPP alert on JOBS) that this enables companies to delay going public, which seems contrary to the purpose of JOBS.

Stock Compensation Exempted

JOBS also exempts shareholders that acquired their stock through company benefit plans from this threshold. SEC regulations and a recently issued no-action letter (see “No Action on RSUs“, February 29, 2012) already exempted options and RSUs from the threshold, but now actual shares of stock acquired through these and other compensatory arrangements are also exempted.

Private companies will now be able to allow their employees to purchase stock before they go public without triggering the registration requirement regardless of how many employees they have. This could be a little dangerous in that employees that don’t have much investing experience sometimes don’t understand the potential pitfalls of investing in high-risk, illiquid stocks. I believe that, in most cases although there are certainly some exceptions, it doesn’t make sense for rank-and-file employees to buy or (incur taxable income on) their employer’s stock before that stock is liquid.

In a series of FAQs issued last week, the SEC clarified that this exemption applies regardless of whether the individual holding stock received through a company stock plan is a current or former employee.  It isn’t clear, however, whether the exemption will continue to apply if the individual sells the stock acquired under a company plan (e.g., on one of the secondary markets) to another investor. 

Deregistering

For non-banks, the threshold for deregistering did not change, so companies that have already been forced to register and are now filing public reports will have to continue to do so until they have fewer than 300 shareholders (or less than $10 million in assets).  For banks, the deregistration threshold did increase, to 1,300 shareholders (again, I have no idea why banks get special treatment). 

NASPP “To Do” List
We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so we keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in our blog. 

– Barbara  

Tags: , , ,

April 10, 2012

JOBS for Stock Compensation

Last week, on April 5, President Obama signed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act into law. Intended to make it easier for startups to raise capital and go public, JOBS has three primary thrusts: 1) making it easier to raise capital (including “crowdfunding” and unregistered offerings), 2) making it easier for companies to go public, and 3) making it easier for newly public companies to be public (e.g., reduced public reporting). Today I begin looking at the provisions of JOBS that are relevant to stock compensation.

Reduced Disclosures for EGCs

JOBS creates a new category of company, an “Emerging Growth Company.” An EGC is essentially a company with less than $1 billion in revenues that is private or has been public for less than five years (I’m simplifying this, there are a couple of other requirements). In addition to provisions designed to encourage investment in EGCS and allow them to explore an IPO without filing a public registration statement, JOBS also reduces the public disclosures and reporting EGCs are subject to.

In the context of compensation, EGCs are allowed to comply with the executive compensation disclosures required for smaller reporting companies (companies with a public float of less than $75 million or, if unable to calculate public float, revenues of less than $50 million).  This results in the following changes to their disclosures:

  • Disclosure for only top three, rather than top five, NEOs
  • No CD&A 
  • Only two years reported in Summary Compensation Table
  • Fewer tabular disclosures: only the SCT, Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table, and Director Compensation Table

Dodd-Frank “Light”

EGCs also don’t have to comply with some of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, including:

  • Say-on-Pay, et. al.
  • CEO pay ratio disclosure
  • Disclosure relating executive pay to company financial performance

Of course, right now, there aren’t any companies required to comply with the CEO pay ratio and executive pay for performance disclosures because the SEC hasn’t promulgated rules on these yet. JOBS only adds to the long list of SEC rule-making projects and I’ve read speculation that the SEC won’t make the deadlines under JOBS because of Dodd-Frank and other rulemaking projects that are still outstanding.

Mark Borges of Compensia brought up some good points with respect to this area of the JOBS Act in his Proxy Disclosure Blog on CompensationStandards.com (see “Executive Compensation Disclosure and the JOBS Act,” March 31, 2012):

I also find it ironic that, just 21 months after Congress decided that shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation were a critical component of an effective corporate governance system, that policy has now taken a back seat to other considerations when it comes to recently-public companies.

Finally, I can’t quite get my head around the reasoning for exempting emerging growth companies from the CEO pay ratio requirement. It was my understanding that the complaints of the business community that the provision is too burdensome were falling on deaf ears in Congress. Yet, it appears that Congress has just decided that the provision is too burdensome for newly-public companies – a group that, ostensibly, doesn’t face the same compliance challenges of large, global companies.

Stay tuned; next week I’ll discuss the new shareholder thresholds for required registration.

NASPP Conference Early-Bird Rate Ends on Friday
The early-bird rate for the 20th Annual NASPP Conference ends this Friday, April 13.  This rate will not be extended, so don’t wait any longer to register.

Online Fundamentals Starts on Thursday
The NASPP’s acclaimed online program, Stock Plan Fundamentals, starts this Thursday, April 12.  This is a great program for anyone new to the industry.  Register today so you don’t miss the first webcast.

NASPP “To Do” List
We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so we keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in our blog. 

– Barbara 

Tags: , , , , , , ,