NASPP “To Do” List
We have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so we keep an ongoing “to do” list for you here in our blog.
Tags: NASPP To Do List
If you are an issuer that will be submitting a request for additional shares for your stock plan to a shareholder vote in the upcoming proxy season, you need to read this blog. I’m filing this under “don’t say I didn’t warn you.”
What Does Martha Stewart Have to Do With This?
A while back, a short blurb about Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia caught my eye and I put it in my back pocket for a future blog entry if I ever figured out what the heck it was about. The blurb appeared in Mark Borges’ proxy disclosure blog on CompensationStandards.com:
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. was the target of a shareholder class action lawsuit alleging that the company’s disclosure in connection with a proposal to increase the share reserve of its omnibus stock plan was inadequate.
This intrigued me because:
- In my other, non-stock compensation life, I secretly want to be Martha Stewart (but with better hair and no insider trading scandal), so I’m fascinated by anything involving her. (Don’t scoff–I’m very crafty! I make all my own window treatments, can refinish a dining room table, and can whip up some pretty tasty jams and jellies.)
- It involved the company’s stock plan, which falls squarely into the category of “things I care a lot about.”
Now, thanks to Mike Melbinger’s Oct 26 blog entry on CompensationStandards.com, I’ve finally figured out the implications of the lawsuit and determined that, if you are an issuer, it should be something you care a lot about as well.
Lawsuit Over Stock Plan Disclosures Could Delay Shareholders Meeting
There have now been several similar lawsuits filed. The lawsuits allege that the company’s disclosures relating to stock plan or Say-on-Pay proposals are inadequate and seek to delay the shareholders meeting. As Mike explains it:
[Companies] are forced to decide between (a) paying the class action lawyers hundreds of thousands of dollars of attorneys’ fees and issuing enhanced disclosures or (b) fighting the matter through a preliminary injunction hearing, which may have the effect of delaying [their] shareholder meeting (and create additional legal fees).
One company has already paid $625K to plaintiff attorneys to settle a similar lawsuit and, while they didn’t have to delay their entire annual meeting, they still had to delay the vote on their stock plan and file a supplement to their proxy statement with additional disclosures about the plan.
What Can You Do?
Mike asks “Does that sound like Armageddon?” and I’d say that it sure sounds like that me. Mike says that it is too soon to panic but suggests taking extra care in drafting your disclosures relating to any stock plan proposals and your Say-on-Pay propoals. A recent memo we posted from Orrick has suggestions for fortifying both types of disclosures against attack. Here are their suggestions for disclosures relating to any stock plan proposals:
-
Disclose the number of shares currently available for issuance under the stock plan and explain why the existing share reserve is insufficient to meet future needs. Consider citing your current burn rate and anticipated shares needed for new grants over the next year.
-
Explain how the remaining shares in the reserve and the new shares will be used and how long the new share reserve is expected to last.
-
Describe how you determined the number of shares you are requesting approval of.
– Barbara
Tags: disclosures, lawsuits, lawyers, plaintiff attorneys, proxy, shareholder approval, shareholder vote, stock plan proposals
The Los Angeles and San Fernando Valley chapters are holding a joint meeting to present the results of the 2012 Global Equity Incentives Survey, co-sponsored by the NASPP and PwC. The meeting will be held on Friday, November 9, from 11:30 to 1:30 PM in Pasadena. Robyn Shutak of the NASPP will be one of the presenters (along with Jennifer George of PwC), be sure to say hello!
Tags: NASPP Chapter Meeting
The 20th Annual Conference in New Orleans was packed with fantastic and useful information throughout. In particular, I want to draw attention to a special moment that actually occurred in one of the pre-conference sessions. Attendees of the pre-conference session on Proxy Disclosure were treated to an address by Meredith Cross, Director of the SEC’s Corporation Finance Division. Director Cross shared insight into SEC priorities and roadmap, as well as iterated some specific reminders for public companies. In today’s blog I’ll summarize some of Director Cross’ key points.
Housekeeping
First, I want to mention that Director Cross began her address with a disclaimer, stating that what she said reflects her own opinions and not formally those of the SEC. I feel compelled to reiterate that here. Still, her insights are undoubtedly valuable insight into the workings and thought process of the SEC.
Disclosures, Disclosures
Director Cross began by sharing her opinion on the state of company disclosures post adoption of Say-on-Pay. She stated that overall, the SEC has observed compliance with the requirements and resultant higher quality disclosures. One thing the SEC is considering is a retrospective review of Say-on-Pay related disclosures to see if they are actually achieving what the SEC hoped they would. What is the SEC hoping for in terms of quality Say-on-Pay disclosures? One example would be individualized reporting for each company director; that level of granularity is what the SEC is looking for in the context of quality disclosures. Data gathered during the review of disclosures will likely be used to determine if any disclosure requirements need tweaking.
Dodd-Frank: What’s Next?
The Dodd-Frank Act came with a myriad of rules to implement, which has kept the SEC rather busy. Some of the rules adopted by the SEC direct the national securities exchanges to develop their own listing standards to implement certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act that relate to compensation committees and director independence. The stock exchanges had until 9/25/2012 to submit their proposals to the SEC. Both NYSE and NASDAQ have posted their proposals on their respective web sites. Director Cross encourages companies to review the proposals and comment as they feel appropriate. The SEC has until 6/27/2013 to adopt the new standards.
On other Dodd-Frank notes, the SEC still has remaining rules to implement. Self admittedly, the SEC was challenged in accurately predicting the timing for implementation. Director Cross noted that the SEC has made good progress on all Dodd-Frank requirements that had deadlines, which took priority. Attention will now turn to implementation of the remaining rules (after turning some attention to focus on deadlines imposed by the JOBS Act first).
Tips
What I really appreciated about Director Cross’ address is that she had real tips to provide to issuer companies. I think anytime there’s an opportunity to hear from someone at one of the regulators, visibility into their thinking is more transparent. For example, the Director Cross says the SEC is aware of some specific concerns raised by companies relative to their disclosures. Namely, questions around putting supplemental income in context (e.g. if you pay a bonus in January that was earned prior to December 31, when do you disclose it?). According to Director Cross, the SEC needs to make sure these scenarios are interpreted consistently (my interpretation: don’t be surprised if down the road some interpretive guidance is issued.) Another area of concern for companies is the reporting of realized vs. realizable income. There’s no industry definition for this, so Director Cross’ advice is to approach it consistently year-over-year.
Reminders
On a final note, Director Cross had a few reminders for companies:
- 402(s) disclosures (how compensation practices relate to risk management) – companies need to remember that even if compensation practices haven’t changed, the company’s approach to risk management may have changed. For this reason, companies need to assess both practices annually.
- Performance Targets – remember that if a performance target isn’t met, this could be material, and the SEC expects companies to have related discussion in the CD&A disclosure in the proxy.
- Say-on-Pay – companies should view their proxy statement as an advocate for their pay practices, and a means to communicate with their shareholders.
It certainly was a treat to have Director Cross’ participation in the Proxy Disclosure pre-conference session, and hopefully this summary has provided an inside view into some of the SEC’s agenda, concerns, and radar.
-Jennifer
Tags: Dodd-Frank, Meredith Cross, Say-on-Pay, SEC